Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

document and test rclcpp::Node::list_parameters #721

Closed
wjwwood opened this issue May 15, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

document and test rclcpp::Node::list_parameters #721

wjwwood opened this issue May 15, 2019 · 7 comments
Labels
documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@wjwwood
Copy link
Member

wjwwood commented May 15, 2019

As a follow up of #495 (the method has existed for a long time, but I just didn't have time to fix it up in that pr), we need to still document and test the rclcpp::Node::list_parameters method.

@wjwwood wjwwood added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed documentation labels May 15, 2019
DensoADAS pushed a commit to DensoADAS/rclcpp that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2022
…to enable further progress (ros2#721)

Signed-off-by: Emerson Knapp <[email protected]>
@CursedRock17
Copy link
Contributor

It seems that pull request #1342 solved the tests for this function, is there any need for the documentation to be updated?

@fujitatomoya
Copy link
Collaborator

@CursedRock17 i think the rest of the work here is

* \todo: properly document and test this method.

@CursedRock17
Copy link
Contributor

@fujitatomoya I did see that, but it was added in this commit in April 2019, whereas the pull request to "fix this" was added in September 2020. That being said, if there's still not enough documentation/testing around list_parameters I can still work on it. Although, there's a whole test here for list_parameter which should be enough.

@fujitatomoya
Copy link
Collaborator

@CursedRock17 i think tests have been added with list_parameters but still doc section is not well described? that is what i mean here.

* \todo: properly document and test this method.

so adding documentation is the rest of the work here? what do you think?

@CursedRock17
Copy link
Contributor

That's fair there's not much documentation there, do you mind if I make a pull request for this?

@fujitatomoya
Copy link
Collaborator

Please go for it, happy to do review 👍

@CursedRock17
Copy link
Contributor

This can probably be closed now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants