Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support checking a URDF given on stdin #171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2023
Merged

Support checking a URDF given on stdin #171

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2023

Conversation

nickswalker
Copy link
Contributor

Makes it easier to pipe results from xacro, and matches urdfdom_py's behavior
Switch an fstream to an ifstream for clarity
Closes #170

Makes it easier to pipe results from xacro, and matches urdfdom_py's behavior
Closes #170
Copy link
Contributor

@clalancette clalancette left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay. This looks good, I'll run CI on it just to be sure.

@clalancette
Copy link
Contributor

CI:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@clalancette clalancette merged commit 6d3c5de into ros:master Aug 28, 2023
harleylara pushed a commit to traversaro/urdfdom that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2024
Makes it easier to pipe results from xacro, and matches urdfdom_py's behavior
Closes ros#170

Signed-off-by: harleylara <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature request: check_urdf should be able to read from std_in
3 participants