Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ros_comm: 1.12.16-1 in 'kinetic/distribution.yaml' [bloom] #26329

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2020
Merged

ros_comm: 1.12.16-1 in 'kinetic/distribution.yaml' [bloom] #26329

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2020

Conversation

dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member

Increasing version of package(s) in repository ros_comm to 1.12.16-1:

message_filters

  • No changes

ros_comm

  • No changes

rosbag

  • No changes

rosbag_storage

  • No changes

rosconsole

  • No changes

roscpp

* use fully qualified ceil() in condition_variable.h (#2025 <https://github.com/ros/ros_comm/issues/2025>)
* remove 'using namespace' from condition_variable.h (#2020 <https://github.com/ros/ros_comm/issues/2020>)

rosgraph

  • No changes

roslaunch

  • No changes

roslz4

  • No changes

rosmaster

  • No changes

rosmsg

  • No changes

rosnode

  • No changes

rosout

  • No changes

rosparam

  • No changes

rospy

  • No changes

rosservice

  • No changes

rostest

  • No changes

rostopic

  • No changes

roswtf

  • No changes

topic_tools

  • No changes

xmlrpcpp

  • No changes

@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas requested a review from tfoote as a code owner August 26, 2020 23:30
@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member Author

dirk-thomas commented Aug 26, 2020

@tfoote The recent sync published a regression into Kinetic which breaks builds of downstream packages (ros/ros_comm#2015 (comment)) which this patch release resolves. It might be worth to sync this earlier than wait for the usual cycle.

@jacobperron jacobperron merged commit 1e81364 into ros:master Aug 27, 2020
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas deleted the bloom-ros_comm-0 branch August 27, 2020 19:25
@ros-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on ROS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.ros.org/t/preparing-for-kinetic-sync-2020-08-20/16002/6

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants