Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed print statements from buffer interface #530

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2022

Conversation

jlunenburg
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jlunenburg jlunenburg requested a review from tfoote as a code owner March 22, 2022 20:43
@MatthijsBurgh
Copy link
Contributor

@tfoote friendly ping ;)

Copy link
Member

@tfoote tfoote left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks yeah, these are unnecessary and can be cleaned up.

The documentation reads that it was potentially used for testing more than expected to be used as the primary method. But I think it does appear to be the primary usage.

@tfoote tfoote merged commit f3e6990 into ros:noetic-devel Apr 5, 2022
MatthijsBurgh added a commit to MatthijsBurgh/geometry2 that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
ahcorde pushed a commit to ros2/geometry2 that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
mergify bot pushed a commit to ros2/geometry2 that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
mergify bot pushed a commit to ros2/geometry2 that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
ahcorde pushed a commit to ros2/geometry2 that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2023
Matching ros/geometry2#530

(cherry picked from commit 4b84838)

Co-authored-by: Matthijs van der Burgh <[email protected]>
ahcorde pushed a commit to ros2/geometry2 that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2023
Matching ros/geometry2#530

(cherry picked from commit 4b84838)

Co-authored-by: Matthijs van der Burgh <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants