Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/noetic python support #508

Merged

Conversation

asukiaaa
Copy link
Contributor

The commits are cherry picked by theseankelly to noetic-turtlebot branch branch from gcc7-fixes branch.

@mikepurvis
Copy link
Member

mikepurvis commented Aug 20, 2020

I guess this is still an omnibus in the way that #480 was, but at this point pragmatism should carry the day. Please also re-enable the python_socket test here, and if that passes clean on Noetic CI, then we're good to go:

# add_rostest(test/rosserial_python_socket.test)

@asukiaaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

asukiaaa commented Aug 20, 2020

Thank you for the information.
I merged your commit to my branch asukiaaa:feature/noetic-python-support to activate test.
Could you create PR to my(asukiaaa's) branch not to mikepurvis's branch on next?

Copy link
Contributor

@stertingen stertingen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR currently silences a warning about undefined behavior without actually fixing it. The portable way is std::memcpy.

rosserial_client/src/ros_lib/ros/msg.h Show resolved Hide resolved
rosserial_client/src/ros_lib/ros/msg.h Show resolved Hide resolved
@mikepurvis mikepurvis merged commit a7ac6cd into ros-drivers:noetic-devel Aug 21, 2020
@asukiaaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for checking and merging.

@asukiaaa asukiaaa deleted the feature/noetic-python-support branch August 21, 2020 13:16
@mikepurvis
Copy link
Member

Thank you for the work rebasing this branch and putting up the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants