-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
3 changed files
with
51 additions
and
98 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
edf26cf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mdsumner That's a commit that polishes off most of
osmdata_sc()
. It's not yet usable, but the good news for you is that it appears to be generally 20 times faster thanosmdata_sf()
. That is hugely more than I would have ever expected before I started implementing this. By the time it plugs intododgr
, the whole pre-processing stages are going to be absolutely smoking in comparison to any other approach. This should provide a great argument for why peeps should bother withSC
in the first place.edf26cf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome. Worth creating a benchmark, e.g. a benchmark vignette? One for the 'nice to do' list probably. Look forward to seeing it in action!