Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Recommended scaffolding for spatial packages (#362)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
mpadge authored Nov 19, 2021
1 parent 281de94 commit 6f00fd2
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletion.
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion appendix.Rmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,7 +4,9 @@

## dev

- 2021-11-18, update advice on grouping functions for pkgdown output (#361)
* 2021-11-19, add recommended spatial packages to scaffolding section (software-review-meta#47)

* 2021-11-18, update advice on grouping functions for pkgdown output (#361)

* 2021-11-04, add mentions of stat software review to software review intro and to the first book page (#342).

Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions pkg_building.Rmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -399,6 +399,8 @@ rather than one where it is re-exported. For instance many functions in **devtoo
* For parsing, creating, and manipulating XML, we strongly recommend [xml2][] for most cases. [You can refer to Daniel Nüst's notes about migration from XML to xml2](https://gist.github.com/nuest/3ed3b0057713eb4f4d75d11bb62f2d66).
* For spatial data, the [sp][] package should be considered deprecated in favour of [sf][], and the packages [rgdal][], [maptools][], and [rgeos][] will be retired by the end of 2023. We recommend use of the spatial suites developed by the [r-spatial](https://github.com/r-spatial) and [rspatial](https://github.com/rspatial) communities. See [this GitHub issue](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review-meta/issues/47) for relevant discussions.
## Version Control
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 6f00fd2

Please sign in to comment.