Add support for named arguments #634
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
when macro function is invoked from command line or by `.x macro.C` metacommand
ghost
closed this
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
when macro function is invoked from command line or by
.x macro.Cmetacommandi.e.
root 'macro.C(#arg3 = 13, arg1 = {42, 43}, arg5 = "string"#)'(compiled macros are also supported) or from ROOT REPL:.x macro.C(#arg3 = 13, arg1 = {42, 43}, arg5 = "string"#).N.B.! No space between parentheses and
#.Calling from REPL as
macro(#arg3 = 13, arg1 = {42, 43}, arg5 = "string"#)is not supported (yet?).Passing arguments as options (
root macro.C+ --# arg3=13 'arg1={42, 43}' 'arg5="string"'), like in #616will be implemented if this PR mergedis implemented.Some implementation decisions, e.g. error reporting, are suboptimal so discussion, suggestions, criticism are welcome.