Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

samples for Iterable.toContain.exactly #1544

Closed
2 tasks
robstoll opened this issue Sep 26, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1559
Closed
2 tasks

samples for Iterable.toContain.exactly #1544

robstoll opened this issue Sep 26, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1559
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@robstoll
Copy link
Owner

Code related feature

Following the things you need to do:

api-infix

  • add a exactly method in IterableLikeToContainCheckerSamples (see CharSequenceToContainCheckerSamples
  • link in the KDoc of the corresponding function in iterableLikeToContainCheckers.kt to the sample via @sample (see charsequenceToContainCheckers.kt)

Your first contribution?

  • Write a comment I'll work on this if you would like to take this issue over.
    This way we get the chance to revise the description in case things have changed in the meantime, we might give you additional hints and we can assign the task to you, so that others do not start as well.
  • See Your first code contribution for guidelines.
  • Do not hesitate to ask questions here or to contact us via Atrium's slack channel if you need help
    (Invite yourself in case you do not have an account yet).
@Nikos-Tsiougranas
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @robstoll, I will work on this

@robstoll robstoll linked a pull request Sep 30, 2023 that will close this issue
robstoll added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2023
…rable-toContain-exactly

Add samples for Iterable.toContain.exactly
@robstoll robstoll added this to the 1.1.0 milestone Sep 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants