Support for aarch64 architecture (which is equivalent to arm64)
#63
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
h-matsuo
changed the title
aarch64 architecture (which is equivalent to arm64)
|
🚀 [bumpr] Bumped! New version:v1.12.2 Changes:v1.12.1...v1.12.2 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
This PR adds support for
aarch64by updating the case handling to treataarch64as equivalent toarm64.Details
In certain OS environments, such as Amazon Linux 2023,
uname -mreturnsaarch64instead ofarm64, even though both represent the same 64-bit ARM architecture.For instance, when using this action on self-hosted runners configured with AWS CodeBuild and Amazon Linux 2023, an
Unsupported architectureerror occurs because the current script expectsuname -mto returnarm64.I’ve already verified that this patch works as expected in the environment described above.