Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(config): support modern ECDH/AES-GCM encryption #27416
feat(config): support modern ECDH/AES-GCM encryption #27416
Changes from 4 commits
036d61a
5d632a5
3ae12cc
830ff5c
9939d3a
d878cd8
6c37e8f
251d1f0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks cryptographically problematic to me.
The shared secret derived by an ECDH key agreement is not uniformly random.
deriveKey
doesn't perform any key stretching or hashing on the shared secret. It is basically the same as callingderiveBits
to get a byte array and then passing it toimportKey
to use as a symmetric key with AES. P-384 generates more output bits than needed, some part will simply be dropped to fit the 256 bits needed for AES.To derive a cryptographically strong key for AES-GCM, the shared secret needs to be processed via HKDF. An example how to do this can be found here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/67942717/589259
Note that this example uses an empty salt. I'd say it makes sense to use a salt though, as it ensures that reusing the same shared secret for two operations will still yield different encryption keys. I'd suggest prepending it to the ciphertext.
Also see:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 didn't know that. do we need a separate value for salt, or can we reuse the aes-gcm iv?
We should try to make the encypted object as small as possible but of cause as secure as possible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Salt and IV are similar in some ways but also need to fulfill different requirements depending on what you want to achieve. I'd suggest to not simply reuse the same values. What you could do in this particular case:
Call
deriveBits({ name: "HKDF", ...
(as shown in the stackoverflow example above) and produce bits for both the key and the VI. You can use theiv
(as it is currently named in your code) as a salt value for the HKDF. When callingderiveBits
, increase thelength
param by the 96 bits you need for the IV, so 256 + 96 bits overall, then use the trailing 96 bits for the IV.This way you don't need to prepend it to the ciphertext and the HKDF ensures it's uniformly random for use with a symmetric cipher like AES. If you change the salt, the encryption key and IV will change as well. This is generally desirable because it ensures that if you encrypt multiple texts (with different salt values in the HKDF call), a unique encryption key and IV will be used as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.