Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(packageRules/package-patterns): consider depName for exclude #27046

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2024

Conversation

secustor
Copy link
Collaborator

@secustor secustor commented Feb 4, 2024

Changes

Consider depName for exclude package patterns rules.

Context

#27024

matchPackagePatterns implementation #22703

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

@secustor secustor requested review from viceice and rarkins February 4, 2024 10:15
@secustor secustor enabled auto-merge February 4, 2024 10:18
@secustor secustor added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 4, 2024
@secustor secustor removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Feb 4, 2024
@secustor secustor added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into renovatebot:main with commit a9c3725 Feb 4, 2024
36 checks passed
@secustor secustor deleted the fix/exclude-package-patterns branch February 4, 2024 10:27
@renovate-release
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 37.171.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants