-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: add per manager known list of issues #15791
docs: add per manager known list of issues #15791
Conversation
- init commit
- now querying once
Generated doc: title: Automated Dependency Updates for Npm
|
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <[email protected]>
- use own GithubHttp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please sort by issue number so oldest go first.
And are we sure we want to collapse them? If so then I suggest we include the number of issues inside the summary/details (e.g. "5 open bug reports")
Agree.
I like the idea to show the number of issues inside the admonition title. |
here it is counted and sorted. i just wonder, would showing features first be better? title: Automated Dependency Updates for Npm
|
- sort asd - show count
Let's put feature requests first, then bugs. And are we sure we want to collapse them? Are we doing that because we want to "hide" them for some reason, or because we think the page will be too long? |
- show features first
yes i also think not collapsing will be more functional. |
@HonkingGoose do you know of a nice UI way to insert this note to the page? (and not just as plain text) |
We can get Material for MkDocs to show the date the document was last updated at the bottom of each page. This feature requires a new dependency though. And maybe the feature breaks for some pages, because we don't properly link all pages. So we definitely should test this on a preview server first. 😉 Material for MkDocs documentation, adding a revision date
|
Maybe we can just include a prettified timestamp/date. e.g. "The above list of features and bugs were current at time of page generation on 27 May 2022". |
that sounds good to me. |
- added date footnote
title: Automated Dependency Updates for Cargo
|
"Upcoming" may be a bit overselling it. Maybe "Related feature requests awaiting implementation" is more honest |
Can we see an updated mockup of how it looks? |
true |
Or just "Open feature requests" and "Open bug reports" |
title: Automated Dependency Updates for Maven
|
@JamieMagee FYI we're going with displaying all features and bug reports now, instead of collapsing. Please see mockup above |
That's what I get for not reading the whole thread before replying 😅 |
BTW this means we need to be diligent with (a) if/when to move from triage to non-triage priority, and (b) making sure issue titles accurately reflect their content. Our users sometimes create issues with alarmist titles like "npm doesn't work" and we need to make sure those are rewritten before they move out of triage. |
Anything else to do here :? |
Co-authored-by: HonkingGoose <[email protected]>
🎉 This PR is included in version 32.79.0 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Changes
Context
Closes #15546
Documentation (please check one with an [x])
How I've tested my work (please tick one)
I have verified these changes via: