-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(react-router-dom): fix getSearchParamsForLocation
in Firefox
#10620
Merged
brophdawg11
merged 6 commits into
remix-run:dev
from
smithki:usesearchparams-patch-in-firefox-extensions
Jul 13, 2023
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c85a376
Fix TypeError related to 'useSearchParams' in Firefox web extensions
smithki c1cdf8d
add smithki to contributors.yml
smithki d66bd17
add changeset
smithki 5bd74e9
use correct type signature for 'URLSearchParams#forEach'
smithki e51c18d
Add test
brophdawg11 b7ed23d
Merge branch 'dev' into usesearchparams-patch-in-firefox-extensions
brophdawg11 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
--- | ||
"react-router-dom": patch | ||
--- | ||
|
||
Fixes an edge-case affecting web extensions in Firefox that use `URLSearchParams` and the `useSearchParams` hook. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -219,3 +219,4 @@ | |
- yuleicul | ||
- zheng-chuang | ||
- holynewbie | ||
- smithki |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't the signature reversed here and
key
would be the second parameter?This also tells me we've not got sufficient test coverage over this, so if you're interested in trying to add a test to around this against
useSearchParams
I'd like to get one added before we merge this. Otherwise I'll try to get some tests wired up when I have a chance.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤦♂️ Nice catch, I'll push an update.
As for tests, I'm not familiar enough with this source code to feel confident in providing new test coverage, but if you have some direction I can take a stab at it. Otherwise, it may be easier to pass that along to you in the interest of expediency.