Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade body-parser from 1.20.3 to 2.0.1 #262

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

snyk-io[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@snyk-io snyk-io bot commented Jan 23, 2025

snyk-io[bot] Powered by Pull Request Badge

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade body-parser from 1.20.3 to 2.0.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


⚠️ Warning: This PR contains major version upgrade(s), and may be a breaking change.

  • The recommended version is 4 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released 4 months ago.

Release notes
Package name: body-parser from body-parser GitHub release notes

Important

  • Warning: This PR contains a major version upgrade, and may be a breaking change.
  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Podsumowanie przez Sourcery

Ulepszenia:

  • Aktualizacja body-parser do wersji 2.0.1, która obejmuje:
    • Wsparcie dla kodowania Brotli
    • Rezygnację ze wsparcia dla starszych wersji Node.js
    • Domyślne ustawienie "extended" na "false" dla parsera urlencoded
    • Zmianę domyślnego poziomu głębokości parsowania danych URL-encoded do 32
Original summary in English

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

  • Upgrade body-parser to version 2.0.1, which includes support for Brotli encoding, drops support for older Node.js versions, defaults "extended" to "false" for urlencoded parser, and changes the default depth level for parsing URL-encoded data to 32.

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade body-parser from 1.20.3 to 2.0.1.

See this package in npm:
body-parser

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/reisene/project/55e114f8-489e-4f14-b900-20574b041e59?utm_source=github-cloud-app&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Copy link
Contributor

aviator-app bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Current Aviator status

Aviator will automatically update this comment as the status of the PR changes.
Comment /aviator refresh to force Aviator to re-examine your PR (or learn about other /aviator commands).

This PR was merged manually (without Aviator). Merging manually can negatively impact the performance of the queue. Consider using Aviator next time.


See the real-time status of this PR on the Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension to see the status of your PR within GitHub.

Copy link
Contributor

aviator-app bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Aviator Changeset actions:

Copy link

semanticdiff-com bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

Changed Files
File Status
  package.json  37% smaller
  package-lock.json  21% smaller

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 23, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
hulaj-dusza-serwis ❌ Failed (Inspect) Jan 23, 2025 7:49am

Copy link

Please follow naming conventions! 😿

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor Author

snyk-io bot commented Jan 23, 2025

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

Copy link
Contributor

deepsource-io bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 0c8f12c..5f08890. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource PHP LogoPHP✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage⚠️ Artifact not reportedTimed out: Artifact was never reportedView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Przewodnik Recenzenta przez Sourcery

Ten pull request aktualizuje zależność body-parser z wersji 1.20.3 do 2.0.1. Jest to aktualizacja głównej wersji, która obejmuje zmiany powodujące niezgodność i może wymagać ręcznych dostosowań.

Diagram klas przedstawiający zmiany powodujące niezgodność w body-parser

classDiagram
    class BodyParser_v1 {
        +req.body: Object
        +urlencoded(extended: true)
        +depth: Infinity
        -parseBody()
    }
    class BodyParser_v2 {
        +req.body: undefined|Object
        +urlencoded(extended: false)
        +depth: 32
        +brotliSupport: true
        -parseBody()
    }
    note for BodyParser_v2 "Zmiany powodujące niezgodność w v2.0.1"
Loading

Zmiany na Poziomie Plików

Zmiana Szczegóły Pliki
Zaktualizowano zależność body-parser.
  • Zaktualizowano wersję body-parser z 1.20.3 do 2.0.1 w package.json.
  • Zaktualizowano wersję body-parser w package-lock.json.
package.json
package-lock.json

Porady i polecenia

Interakcja z Sourcery

  • Wywołanie nowej recenzji: Skomentuj @sourcery-ai review w pull requeście.
  • Kontynuacja dyskusji: Odpowiedz bezpośrednio na komentarze recenzji Sourcery.
  • Wygenerowanie zgłoszenia GitHub z komentarza recenzji: Poproś Sourcery o utworzenie zgłoszenia z komentarza recenzji, odpowiadając na niego. Możesz również odpowiedzieć na komentarz recenzji @sourcery-ai issue, aby utworzyć zgłoszenie.
  • Wygenerowanie tytułu pull requesta: Napisz @sourcery-ai w dowolnym miejscu tytułu pull requesta, aby wygenerować tytuł w dowolnym momencie. Możesz również skomentować @sourcery-ai title w pull requeście, aby (prze-)wygenerować tytuł w dowolnym momencie.
  • Wygenerowanie podsumowania pull requesta: Napisz @sourcery-ai summary w dowolnym miejscu treści pull requesta, aby wygenerować podsumowanie PR dokładnie tam, gdzie chcesz. Możesz również skomentować @sourcery-ai summary w pull requeście, aby (prze-)wygenerować podsumowanie w dowolnym momencie.
  • Wygenerowanie przewodnika recenzenta: Skomentuj @sourcery-ai guide w pull requeście, aby (prze-)wygenerować przewodnik recenzenta w dowolnym momencie.
  • Rozwiązanie wszystkich komentarzy Sourcery: Skomentuj @sourcery-ai resolve w pull requeście, aby rozwiązać wszystkie komentarze Sourcery. Przydatne, jeśli już rozwiązałeś wszystkie komentarze i nie chcesz ich już widzieć.
  • Odrzucenie wszystkich recenzji Sourcery: Skomentuj @sourcery-ai dismiss w pull requeście, aby odrzucić wszystkie istniejące recenzje Sourcery. Szczególnie przydatne, jeśli chcesz zacząć od nowa z nową recenzją - nie zapomnij skomentować @sourcery-ai review, aby wywołać nową recenzję!
  • Wygenerowanie planu działania dla zgłoszenia: Skomentuj @sourcery-ai plan w zgłoszeniu, aby wygenerować plan działania.

Dostosowywanie Twojego Doświadczenia

Uzyskaj dostęp do pulpitu nawigacyjnego, aby:

  • Włączyć lub wyłączyć funkcje recenzji, takie jak podsumowanie pull requesta generowane przez Sourcery, przewodnik recenzenta i inne.
  • Zmienić język recenzji.
  • Dodawać, usuwać lub edytować niestandardowe instrukcje recenzji.
  • Dostosować inne ustawienia recenzji.

Uzyskiwanie Pomocy

Original review guide in English

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request upgrades the body-parser dependency from version 1.20.3 to 2.0.1. This is a major version upgrade, which includes breaking changes and may require manual adjustments.

Class diagram showing body-parser breaking changes

classDiagram
    class BodyParser_v1 {
        +req.body: Object
        +urlencoded(extended: true)
        +depth: Infinity
        -parseBody()
    }
    class BodyParser_v2 {
        +req.body: undefined|Object
        +urlencoded(extended: false)
        +depth: 32
        +brotliSupport: true
        -parseBody()
    }
    note for BodyParser_v2 "Breaking changes in v2.0.1"
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Upgraded the body-parser dependency.
  • Updated body-parser version from 1.20.3 to 2.0.1 in package.json.
  • Updated body-parser version in package-lock.json.
package.json
package-lock.json

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pominęliśmy przegląd tego pull requesta. Oto dlaczego:

  • Wygląda na to, że został utworzony przez bota (cześć, snyk-io[bot]!). Zakładamy, że wie, co robi!
  • Wygląda na to, że został utworzony przez bota (znaleziono '[Snyk]' w tytule). Zakładamy, że wie, co robi!
Original comment in English

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

  • It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, snyk-io[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!
  • It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!

Copy link

Click here to review and test in web IDE: Contribute

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Merge Protections

Your pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid.

🟢 Do not merge outdated PRs

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

Make sure PRs are almost up to date before merging

  • #commits-behind <= 10

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review by ChatGPT

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
npm/body-parser 2.0.1 🟢 6.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Branch-Protection🟢 3branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
CI-Tests🟢 924 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Code-Review🟢 7found 6 unreviewed changesets out of 28 -- score normalized to 7
Contributors🟢 1027 different organizations found -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Dependency-Update-Tool⚠️ 0no update tool detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Maintained🟢 86 commit(s) out of 30 and 4 issue activity out of 30 found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Packaging⚠️ -1no published package detected
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 3dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
Vulnerabilities🟢 10no vulnerabilities detected
npm/debug 3.1.0 🟢 4.3
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 3Found 10/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Dangerous-Workflow⚠️ -1no workflows found
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Token-Permissions⚠️ -1No tokens found
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ -1no dependencies found
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 72 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
npm/iconv-lite 0.5.2 🟢 3.2
Details
CheckScoreReason
Dangerous-Workflow⚠️ -1no workflows found
Code-Review⚠️ 1Found 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained⚠️ 00 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Token-Permissions⚠️ -1No tokens found
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ -1no dependencies found
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
npm/raw-body 3.0.0 🟢 4.2
Details
CheckScoreReason
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Code-Review⚠️ 1Found 2/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Maintained⚠️ 00 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
npm/body-parser ^2.0.1 🟢 6.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Branch-Protection🟢 3branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
CI-Tests🟢 924 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Code-Review🟢 7found 6 unreviewed changesets out of 28 -- score normalized to 7
Contributors🟢 1027 different organizations found -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Dependency-Update-Tool⚠️ 0no update tool detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Maintained🟢 86 commit(s) out of 30 and 4 issue activity out of 30 found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Packaging⚠️ -1no published package detected
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 3dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
Vulnerabilities🟢 10no vulnerabilities detected

Scanned Files

  • package-lock.json
  • package.json

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review by ChatGPT

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 28b48d4 into main Jan 23, 2025
34 of 49 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the snyk-upgrade-081c29188bc7124eb46c29a921f45ce9 branch January 23, 2025 07:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants