Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

operators [CI] nexus-operator-m88i (0.6.0) #511

Conversation

ricardozanini
Copy link
Contributor

@ricardozanini ricardozanini commented Dec 7, 2021

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini [email protected]

Thanks submitting your Operator. Please check below list before you create your Pull Request.

New Submissions

Updates to existing Operators

  • Did you create a ci.yaml file according to the update instructions?
  • Is your new CSV pointing to the previous version with the replaces property if you chose replaces-mode via the updateGraph property in ci.yaml?
  • Is your new CSV referenced in the appropriate channel defined in the package.yaml or annotations.yaml ?
  • Have you tested an update to your Operator when deployed via OLM?
  • Is your submission signed?

Your submission should not

  • Modify more than one operator
  • Modify an Operator you don't own
  • Rename an operator - please remove and add with a different name instead
  • Modify any files outside the above mentioned folders
  • Contain more than one commit. Please squash your commits.

Operator Description must contain (in order)

  1. Description about the managed Application and where to find more information
  2. Features and capabilities of your Operator and how to use it
  3. Any manual steps about potential pre-requisites for using your Operator

Operator Metadata should contain

  • Human readable name and 1-liner description about your Operator
  • Valid category name1
  • One of the pre-defined capability levels2
  • Links to the maintainer, source code and documentation
  • Example templates for all Custom Resource Definitions intended to be used
  • A quadratic logo

Remember that you can preview your CSV here.

--

1 If you feel your Operator does not fit any of the pre-defined categories, file an issue against this repo and explain your need

2 For more information see here

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from J0zi and mvalarh December 7, 2021 13:15
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Dec 7, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 7, 2021

Hi @ricardozanini. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a redhat-openshift-ecosystem member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 7, 2021

Dockerfile or bundle.Dockerfile is added/changed. Note that for security reasons none of these files are going to be used when building bundle. Docker file will be generated and all label information is taken from annotations.yaml.

@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 7, 2021

Automatic Cluster Version Label (OCP) - packagemanifest only

Starting OCP v4.9 (based on k8s 1.22) some old API were deprecated(Deprecated API Migration Guide from v1.22, OKD/OpenShift Catalogs criteria and options). User can set com.redhat.openshift.versions: <versions>in its bundle annotations.yaml file to limit specific operator version to be visible on certain cluster.
Users can set label only when the operator is in bundle format. For packagemanifest format it is not possible to set this lablel, but community-operators pipeline can automatically set such label to the bundle. User have to allow it by putting packagemanifestClusterVersionLabel: auto in ci.yaml file

$ cat <path-to-operator>/ci.yaml
packagemanifestClusterVersionLabel: auto

More info here.

@ricardozanini
Copy link
Contributor Author

@J0zi @mvalarh the CI is trying to add the label nexus-operator-m88i:v0.6.0 => v4.6-v4.8 to this new version, but that will prevent the operator to be installed in 4.9. This version is an upgrade to be compatible with 4.9. How do I change this?

@ricardozanini
Copy link
Contributor Author

@J0zi @mvalarh the CI is trying to add the label nexus-operator-m88i:v0.6.0 => v4.6-v4.8 to this new version, but that will prevent the operator to be installed in 4.9. This version is an upgrade to be compatible with 4.9. How do I change this?

Fixed:

    0.6.0:
      idx_label: ''
      idx_versions:
      - '4.6'
      - '4.7'
      - '4.8'
      - '4.9'
      in_prod: false
      k8s_max: ''
      k8s_min: ''
      ocp_max: ''
      replaces: 0.5.0

@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 7, 2021

Current PR can be merged automatically, but there is missing authorized-changes label. One can find out more info here.

@ricardozanini
Copy link
Contributor Author

Current PR can be merged automatically, but there is missing authorized-changes label. One can find out more info here.

I'm on the list of the reviewers now :)

@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

@framework-automation framework-automation merged commit 4cde81f into redhat-openshift-ecosystem:main Dec 7, 2021
@ricardozanini ricardozanini deleted the nexus-0.6 branch December 7, 2021 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants