Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Dubious relevance for autocompletion #142

Closed
fbricon opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Dubious relevance for autocompletion #142

fbricon opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@fbricon
Labels
bug content-assist
Milestone
Mid February 2017

Comments

@fbricon
Copy link
Collaborator

fbricon commented Jan 18, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Autocompletion sometimes shows dubious results. See http://www.screencast.com/users/fbricon/folders/Jing/media/af69168e-7d2e-42d3-8793-80ea981241bd

Steps To Reproduce

Type ByteArrayInputStream is = new B+<ctrl+space>

Current Result

the ByteArrayInputStream constructors come last in the list

Expected Result

the ByteArrayInputStream constructors should come first in the list
@fbricon fbricon added the bug label Jan 18, 2017
@fbricon fbricon added this to the Late January 2017 milestone Jan 18, 2017
@fbricon fbricon self-assigned this Jan 18, 2017
fbricon added a commit to fbricon/eclipse.jdt.ls that referenced this issue Jan 31, 2017
@fbricon
Fix completion proposals sorttext. See redhat-developer/vscode-java/i…
32173de 
…ssues/142

Signed-off-by: Fred Bricon <[email protected]>
@fbricon fbricon mentioned this issue Jan 31, 2017
Merged
fbricon added a commit to eclipse-jdtls/eclipse.jdt.ls that referenced this issue Jan 31, 2017
@fbricon
Fix completion proposals sorttext. See redhat-developer/vscode-java/i…
b2b18be 
…ssues/142

Signed-off-by: Fred Bricon <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@fbricon fbricon

Labels
bug content-assist
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Mid February 2017
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@fbricon