Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade react-router-dom from 6.17.0 to 6.18.0 #805

Closed

Conversation

christophe-f
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade react-router-dom from 6.17.0 to 6.18.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 3 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 21 days ago, on 2023-10-31.
Release notes
Package name: react-router-dom from react-router-dom GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: react-router-dom
  • 667f936 chore: Update version for release (#10981)
  • 3c6e27c Exit prerelease mode
  • 67af262 chore: Update version for release (pre) (#10978)
  • 1500288 Updates for v7_fetcherPersist post-processing logic (#10977)
  • cacc90b chore: Update version for release (pre) (#10966)
  • 77402de Enter prerelease mode
  • 1a8265c Merge branch 'main' into release-next
  • 19af0cf Add future.v7_fetcherPersist flag (#10962)
  • cb2d911 Add fetcher data layer (#10961)
  • c0dbcd2 Add useFetcher(key) and <Form navigate={false}> (#10960)
  • 805924d Revert "Ensure Form contains splat portion of pathname when no action is specified (#10933)" (#10965)
  • 677d6c8 Support optional path segments in `matchPath` (#10768)
  • a23f017 docs: Clarify fetcher load revalidation behavior
  • 908a40a Ensure Form contains splat portion of pathname when no action is specified (#10933)
  • 2041d9c chore: sort contributors list
  • a71b4e2 Merge branch 'release-next' into dev
  • 779536c Merge branch 'release-next'
  • e2c0d82 Split up router-test.ts (#10929)
  • e74b935 Fix lint errors

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@christophe-f christophe-f requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2023 14:28
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 21, 2023

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 16d86c2

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Copy link
Contributor

The image is available at: quay.io/janus-idp/backstage-showcase:pr-805!

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2024

The image is available at: quay.io/janus-idp/backstage-showcase:pr-805!

Zaperex
Zaperex previously approved these changes Jan 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Zaperex Zaperex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, will need to regenerate the yarn.lock to include the upgrade though

Copy link
Contributor

janus-idp bot commented Jan 3, 2024

backstage-showcase Tests on commit 11ca279 finished successfully.
View test log

@Zaperex Zaperex dismissed their stale review January 5, 2024 14:02

needs to regenerate yarn.lock

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@schultzp2020
Copy link
Collaborator

fixed in #693

@schultzp2020 schultzp2020 deleted the snyk-upgrade-e1675614a4a4f9d198e85ae290a9f33a branch April 5, 2024 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants