-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Remove resource limits for manager container #783
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Siddhesh Ghadi <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
LGTM, Thanks @svghadi |
/lgtm |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: iam-veeramalla The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick v1.14 |
@svghadi: new pull request created: #784 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What does this PR do / why we need it:
During the operator-sdk upgrade, we set resource limits for the manager container. However, these limits are causing issues for users, particularly on clusters with a large number of secrets and configmaps, as the operator requires significantly more memory to function, leading to OOM kills. We are currently exploring ways to reduce memory consumption, however, this involves significant effort. Therefore, this PR removes the limits to minimize the impact.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes GITOPS-5665
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:
I have tested this change using the reproducer from JIRA. The operator was functioning properly, consuming over 2GB of memory without any OOM kills.