Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2302847: [release-4.16] Bump webpack-bundle-analyzer, jest-environment-jsdom & webpack-dev-serve #1485

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1477

/assign SanjalKatiyar

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 23, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Ignoring requests to cherry-pick non-bug issues: DFBUGS-24

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1477

/assign SanjalKatiyar

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Collaborator

/retitle Bug 2302847: [release-4.16] Bump webpack-bundle-analyzer, jest-environment-jsdom & webpack-dev-serve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.16] DFBUGS-24: Bump webpack-bundle-analyzer, jest-environment-jsdom & webpack-dev-server Bug 2302847: [release-4.16] Bump webpack-bundle-analyzer, jest-environment-jsdom & webpack-dev-serve Aug 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 5, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2302847, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.16.1" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2302847: [release-4.16] Bump webpack-bundle-analyzer, jest-environment-jsdom & webpack-dev-serve

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Collaborator

this PR also fixes BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292784

@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Collaborator

/bugzilla refresh

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 30, 2024

@SanjalKatiyar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2302847, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.16.2) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.16.2)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @PrasadDesala

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 30, 2024

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: PrasadDesala.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@SanjalKatiyar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2302847, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.16.2) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.16.2)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @PrasadDesala

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Aug 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 30, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, SanjalKatiyar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit fa891d6 into red-hat-storage:release-4.16 Aug 30, 2024
3 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 30, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 2302847 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2302847: [release-4.16] Bump webpack-bundle-analyzer, jest-environment-jsdom & webpack-dev-serve

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants