-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compile with -strict-concurrency=complete
#5320
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Only in Bazel for now, because this is considered an unsafe flag in SwiftPM which would lead to warnings for downstream consumers of SwiftLint using SwiftPM. Some imports of SwiftSyntax need the `@preconcurrency` annotation until swiftlang/swift-syntax#2322 is available in a release. The following SwiftLint libraries have `-strict-concurrency=complete` applied: * SwiftLintCoreMacros * SwiftLintBuiltInRules * SwiftLintExtraRules The following SwiftLint libraries don't have the flag applied and need to be migrated: * SwiftLintCore * swiftlint (CLI target) So really the rules and macros are now being compiled with `-strict-concurrency=complete`, but the core infrastructure of SwiftLint is not. Still, given that Swift 6 will eventually make these warnings errors by default, it's good to prevent issues from creeping in earlier rather than later.
Sadly this leads to
So might not want to enable that. 🤔 |
Here's an example of your CHANGELOG entry: * Compile with `-strict-concurrency=complete`.
[jpsim](https://github.com/jpsim)
[#issue_number](https://github.com/realm/SwiftLint/issues/issue_number) note: There are two invisible spaces after the entry's text. Generated by 🚫 Danger |
SimplyDanny
added a commit
to SimplyDanny/SwiftLint
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
See realm#5320 for the reasons behind this.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Only in Bazel for now, because this is considered an unsafe flag in SwiftPM which would lead to warnings for downstream consumers of SwiftLint using SwiftPM.
Some imports of SwiftSyntax need the
@preconcurrency
annotation until swiftlang/swift-syntax#2322 is available in a release.The following SwiftLint libraries have
-strict-concurrency=complete
applied:The following SwiftLint libraries don't have the flag applied and need to be migrated:
So really the rules and macros are now being compiled with
-strict-concurrency=complete
, but the core infrastructure of SwiftLint is not.Still, given that Swift 6 will eventually make these warnings errors by default, it's good to prevent issues from creeping in earlier rather than later.