Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
typo operatorStacktrace misspeld (#506)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
bodtx authored and smaldini committed Mar 29, 2017
1 parent a773db2 commit 575de72
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions src/docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ This is done by customizing the `Hook.onOperator` hook *at application start*
(or at least before the incriminated flux or mono can be instantiated), like so:
[source,java]
----
Hooks.onOperator(providedHook -> providedHook.operatorStackTrace());
Hooks.onOperator(providedHook -> providedHook.operatorStacktrace());
----

The idea is that this will start instrumenting the calls to `Flux` (and
Expand All @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ In the next section, we'll see how the stacktrace differs and how to interpret
that new information.

== Reading a stack trace in debug mode
Reusing our initial example but activating the `operatorStackTrace` debug
Reusing our initial example but activating the `operatorStacktrace` debug
feature, here is the stack we now get:

[source]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ So we could only instrument uses of the incriminating operator by doing:
[source,java]
----
Hooks.onOperator(providedHook -> providedHook.ifName("single") <1>
.operatorStackTrace());
.operatorStacktrace());
----
<1> Only activate for operator classes named "single", ignoring case and the
"Parallel", "Flux" or "Mono" prefixes, as well as "Fuseable" suffix (as seen in
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 575de72

Please sign in to comment.