Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Java worker] Migrate task execution and submission on top of core worker #5370

Merged
merged 129 commits into from
Aug 16, 2019

Conversation

kfstorm
Copy link
Member

@kfstorm kfstorm commented Aug 5, 2019

What do these changes do?

Since #5061 is too large, I submitted #5079 to migrate part of Java worker on top of the core worker. This PR is the continuation of #5079 to migrate task execution and submission of Java worker.

Related issue number

#4850

Linter

  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.

zhijunfu and others added 30 commits June 14, 2019 10:33
@kfstorm
Copy link
Member Author

kfstorm commented Aug 8, 2019

@raulchen Folder structure updated. Can you take a look?

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/16138/
Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/16139/
Test PASSed.

Copy link
Contributor

@raulchen raulchen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. I looked through the whole PR again. It looks pretty good. Left some small comments.

} else if (arg instanceof RayActor) {
data = Serializer.encode(arg);
} else if (arg instanceof NativeRayActor) {
id = Ray.internal().put(arg).getId();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change intended?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This came from #5061, which refactored serialization and also supports passing actor handles cross languages. I've reverted it in this PR to keep the logic consistent with master branch.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/16186/
Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/16185/
Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/16234/
Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/16290/
Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/16291/
Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/16309/
Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/16312/
Test PASSed.

@raulchen raulchen merged commit b1aae0e into ray-project:master Aug 16, 2019
@raulchen raulchen deleted the java_worker_core branch August 16, 2019 05:52
pcmoritz added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2019
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/16323/
Test PASSed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants