-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: make notation verifier installation optional on ratify installation #1719
Merged
susanshi
merged 4 commits into
ratify-project:dev
from
shahramk64:make-notation-verifier-installation-optional
Aug 29, 2024
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f12b6bb
feat: make notation verifier installation optional on ratify installa…
shahramk64 d8febbb
feat: show a warning message when no verifier is enabled for installa…
shahramk64 5447f92
fix: remove the redundant 'NOTES' word
shahramk64 c33763d
Merge branch 'dev' into make-notation-verifier-installation-optional
binbin-li File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
{{- if not (or .Values.notation.enabled .Values.cosign.enabled .Values.sbom.enabled) }} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. we can add check on vulnerabilityreport as well |
||
NOTES: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
*********************************************************** | ||
WARNING: All verifiers are disabled. | ||
It's recommended that at least one is enabled for proper functionality. | ||
*********************************************************** | ||
{{- end }} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@susanshi Should we only check for cosign and notation here? Or sbom should also be included?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
all external plugin should be included too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
curious: does this block print out a warning on helm install?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, Helm doesn't provide a straightforward way to issue a warning that doesn't halt execution, initially I was just printing a string based on the same condition on top of the verifier.yaml file. But it doesn't work, because Helm treated the printed warning message as part of the Kubernetes resource definition.
WE can leverage Helm's NOTES.txt file, which is specifically designed for displaying messages after a successful installation or rendering. While this doesn't show up directly during the template rendering phase, it will ensure the user sees the message right after installation.