-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include hso driver (Option-branded GSM modem) in default Raspbian kernel configuration? #580
Comments
To confirm, you would like CONFIG_USB_HSO=m added to default kernel config? |
Correct; we've been using the serial interface exposed by the driver ( |
Okay, no objections to adding that - will be in next firmware update. |
Fantastic, thank you. |
…erency issues See: raspberrypi/linux#575 kernel: config: Add CONFIG_USB_HOS module (option branded GSM modem) See: raspberrypi/linux#580 tvservice: Allow requesting NTSC frequency variants of hdmi modes See: http://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=75589
…erency issues See: raspberrypi/linux#575 kernel: config: Add CONFIG_USB_HOS module (option branded GSM modem) See: raspberrypi/linux#580 tvservice: Allow requesting NTSC frequency variants of hdmi modes See: http://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=75589
Firmware is updated. Please run rpi-update and confirm module is as expected. |
Updated to 1e98ba5db72d5edceebd05c5e264945ca190b0ec (3.12.18+) and everything works as expected. Thanks again! |
…erency issues See: raspberrypi/linux#575 kernel: config: Add CONFIG_USB_HOS module (option branded GSM modem) See: raspberrypi/linux#580 tvservice: Allow requesting NTSC frequency variants of hdmi modes See: http://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=75589
When a tail call fails, it is documented that the tail call should continue execution at the following instruction. An example tail call sequence is: 12: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit The ARM assembler for the tail call in this case ends up branching to instruction 14 instead of instruction 13, resulting in the BPF filter returning a non-zero value: 178: ldr r8, [sp, #588] ; insn 12 17c: ldr r6, [r8, r6] 180: ldr r8, [sp, #580] 184: cmp r8, r6 188: bcs 0x1e8 18c: ldr r6, [sp, #524] 190: ldr r7, [sp, #528] 194: cmp r7, #0 198: cmpeq r6, #32 19c: bhi 0x1e8 1a0: adds r6, r6, #1 1a4: adc r7, r7, #0 1a8: str r6, [sp, #524] 1ac: str r7, [sp, #528] 1b0: mov r6, #104 1b4: ldr r8, [sp, #588] 1b8: add r6, r8, r6 1bc: ldr r8, [sp, #580] 1c0: lsl r7, r8, #2 1c4: ldr r6, [r6, r7] 1c8: cmp r6, #0 1cc: beq 0x1e8 1d0: mov r8, #32 1d4: ldr r6, [r6, r8] 1d8: add r6, r6, #44 1dc: bx r6 1e0: mov r0, #0 ; insn 13 1e4: mov r1, #0 1e8: add sp, sp, #596 ; insn 14 1ec: pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sl, pc} For other sequences, the tail call could end up branching midway through the following BPF instructions, or maybe off the end of the function, leading to unknown behaviours. Fixes: 39c13c2 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
commit f4483f2 upstream. When a tail call fails, it is documented that the tail call should continue execution at the following instruction. An example tail call sequence is: 12: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit The ARM assembler for the tail call in this case ends up branching to instruction 14 instead of instruction 13, resulting in the BPF filter returning a non-zero value: 178: ldr r8, [sp, #588] ; insn 12 17c: ldr r6, [r8, r6] 180: ldr r8, [sp, #580] 184: cmp r8, r6 188: bcs 0x1e8 18c: ldr r6, [sp, #524] 190: ldr r7, [sp, #528] 194: cmp r7, #0 198: cmpeq r6, #32 19c: bhi 0x1e8 1a0: adds r6, r6, #1 1a4: adc r7, r7, #0 1a8: str r6, [sp, #524] 1ac: str r7, [sp, #528] 1b0: mov r6, #104 1b4: ldr r8, [sp, #588] 1b8: add r6, r8, r6 1bc: ldr r8, [sp, #580] 1c0: lsl r7, r8, #2 1c4: ldr r6, [r6, r7] 1c8: cmp r6, #0 1cc: beq 0x1e8 1d0: mov r8, #32 1d4: ldr r6, [r6, r8] 1d8: add r6, r6, #44 1dc: bx r6 1e0: mov r0, #0 ; insn 13 1e4: mov r1, #0 1e8: add sp, sp, #596 ; insn 14 1ec: pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sl, pc} For other sequences, the tail call could end up branching midway through the following BPF instructions, or maybe off the end of the function, leading to unknown behaviours. Fixes: 39c13c2 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c raspberrypi#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c #580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Hi,
(Apologies in advance if this is the wrong place to file this; there are a couple Raspbian threads that seem to indicate that the Raspberry Pi foundation is building the distribution's kernel.)
The 2004-01 Raspbian image currently ships a kernel configuration in which the
hso
kernel driver is disabled (both in-kernel and as a module). A number of other GSM modem drivers for other manufacturers' devices (e.g.option.ko
) are included as modules, but usinghso
currently seems to require that I download and rebuild the kernel with a modified.config
file.Is there some specific reason this driver isn't shipped? It's in the mainline kernel and appears to work well now that I've rebuilt the kernel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: