Relax ivf-flat test recall thresholds #766
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
achirkin
added
bug
cjnolet
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2022
|
@gpucibot merge |
11 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When
n_probes = n_lists, ivf-flat should perform equal to the brute-force kNN (recall == 1in tests). However, it looks like in some rare cases in CI the recall is slightly smaller. This could be due to some numeric errors or due to the radix_topk not being stable.This PR reduces the recall threshold in the tests for now to avoid occasional failures in the main branch while the issue is investigated.