Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[FEA] Sparse primitives should consistently use two separate templates for rows/cols #312

Open
cjnolet opened this issue Aug 11, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

[FEA] Sparse primitives should consistently use two separate templates for rows/cols #312

cjnolet opened this issue Aug 11, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
feature request New feature or request

Comments

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Aug 11, 2021

While we are at it, we should also consistently use a size_t for the number of nonzeros.
@cjnolet cjnolet added the feature request New feature or request label Aug 11, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been labeled inactive-90d due to no recent activity in the past 90 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been labeled inactive-30d due to no recent activity in the past 30 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed. This issue will be labeled inactive-90d if there is no activity in the next 60 days.

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member Author

cjnolet commented Mar 1, 2022

We should tackle this while implementing the sparse variants of #535 (once #348 is complete)

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been labeled inactive-30d due to no recent activity in the past 30 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed. This issue will be labeled inactive-90d if there is no activity in the next 60 days.

@cjnolet cjnolet mentioned this issue Apr 24, 2022
Closed
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been labeled inactive-90d due to no recent activity in the past 90 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature request New feature or request
Projects
VS/ML/DM Primitives Release Board
Status: No status
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cjnolet