Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEA] Move PartDescriptor & Data abstractions from cuML #10

Open
cjnolet opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

[FEA] Move PartDescriptor & Data abstractions from cuML #10

cjnolet opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented May 18, 2020

These abstractions have been used in the Dask packages of cuML to enable the representation of Dask partitions as input to our multi-node multi-GPU algorithms w/ the communicator. It would be useful for these abstractions to be placed in RAFT in order to create a more unified API for the inputs to primitives.

It would also be nice to include some Cython code for constructing and managing instances of PartDescriptor in order to ease the boilerplate needed and reduce duplication across primitives.

@cjnolet cjnolet added the enhancement New feature or request label May 18, 2020
@divyegala
Copy link
Member

As discussed offline, we plan to port this over from rapidsai/cuml#2262 which solves this

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been marked rotten due to no recent activity in the past 90d. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been marked stale due to no recent activity in the past 30d. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed. This issue will be marked rotten if there is no activity in the next 60d.

rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2024
Demangle the error stack trace provided by GCC.
Example output:
```bash
RAFT failure at file=/workspace/raft/cpp/bench/ann/src/raft/raft_ann_bench_utils.h line=127: Ooops!
Obtained 16 stack frames
#1 in /workspace/raft/cpp/build/libraft_ivf_pq_ann_bench.so: raft::logic_error::logic_error(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) +0x5e [0x7fb20acce45e]
#2 in /workspace/raft/cpp/build/libraft_ivf_pq_ann_bench.so: raft::bench::ann::configured_raft_resources::stream_wait(CUstream_st*) const +0x2e3 [0x7fb20acd0ac3]
#3 in /workspace/raft/cpp/build/libraft_ivf_pq_ann_bench.so: raft::bench::ann::RaftIvfPQ<float, long>::search(float const*, int, int, unsigned long*, float*, CUstream_st*) const +0x63e [0x7fb20acd44fe]
#4 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH: void raft::bench::ann::bench_search<float>(benchmark::State&, raft::bench::ann::Configuration::Index, unsigned long, std::shared_ptr<raft::bench::ann::Dataset<float> const>, raft::bench::ann::Objective) +0xf76 [0x55853859f586]
#5 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH: benchmark::internal::LambdaBenchmark<benchmark::RegisterBenchmark<void (&)(benchmark::State&, raft::bench::ann::Configuration::Index, unsigned long, std::shared_ptr<raft::bench::ann::Dataset<float> const>, raft::bench::ann::Objective), raft::bench::ann::Configuration::Index&, unsigned long&, std::shared_ptr<raft::bench::ann::Dataset<float> const>&, raft::bench::ann::Objective&>(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, void (&)(benchmark::State&, raft::bench::ann::Configuration::Index, unsigned long, std::shared_ptr<raft::bench::ann::Dataset<float> const>, raft::bench::ann::Objective), raft::bench::ann::Configuration::Index&, unsigned long&, std::shared_ptr<raft::bench::ann::Dataset<float> const>&, raft::bench::ann::Objective&)::{lambda(benchmark::State&)#1}>::Run(benchmark::State&) +0x84 [0x558538548f14]
#6 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH: benchmark::internal::BenchmarkInstance::Run(long, int, benchmark::internal::ThreadTimer*, benchmark::internal::ThreadManager*, benchmark::internal::PerfCountersMeasurement*) const +0x168 [0x5585385d6498]
#7 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH(+0x149108) [0x5585385b7108]
#8 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH: benchmark::internal::BenchmarkRunner::DoNIterations() +0x34f [0x5585385b8c7f]
#9 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH: benchmark::internal::BenchmarkRunner::DoOneRepetition() +0x119 [0x5585385b99b9]
#10 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH(+0x13afdd) [0x5585385a8fdd]
#11 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH: benchmark::RunSpecifiedBenchmarks(benchmark::BenchmarkReporter*, benchmark::BenchmarkReporter*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) +0x58e [0x5585385aa8fe]
#12 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH: benchmark::RunSpecifiedBenchmarks() +0x6a [0x5585385aaada]
#13 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH: raft::bench::ann::run_main(int, char**) +0x11ed [0x5585385980cd]
#14 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x28150) [0x7fb213e28150]
#15 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: __libc_start_main +0x89 [0x7fb213e28209]
#16 in ./cpp/build/ANN_BENCH(+0xbfcef) [0x55853852dcef]


```

Authors:
  - Artem M. Chirkin (https://github.com/achirkin)

Approvers:
  - Tamas Bela Feher (https://github.com/tfeher)

URL: #2188
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants