Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip TCP-only DGX tests with UCX 1.16 #1331

Merged

Conversation

pentschev
Copy link
Member

Wireup may fail in UCX 1.16 in nodes with multiple NICs if TCP is used, thus skip those tests. UCX 1.17 will resolve the issue, and alternatively UCX_PROTO_ENABLE=n may be used in UCX 1.16 as well.

Wireup may fail in UCX 1.16 in nodes with multiple NICs if TCP is used,
thus skip those tests. UCX 1.17 will resolve the issue, and
alternatively `UCX_PROTO_ENABLE=n` may be used in UCX 1.16 as well.
@pentschev pentschev added bug Something isn't working 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Apr 7, 2024
@pentschev pentschev requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2024 20:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added the python python code needed label Apr 7, 2024
ucp = pytest.importorskip("ucxx")
if _is_ucx_116(ucp):
pytest.skip(
"Wireup may fail in UCX 1.16 in nodes with multiple NICs if TCP is used"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there an Issue we can link to for the new skip logic?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There wasn't one, I've filed rapidsai/ucx-py#1037 to fill that gap and changed the skip message to point to that link via b0a86ab .

@pentschev
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @rjzamora !

@pentschev
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 7e03a52 into rapidsai:branch-24.06 Apr 8, 2024
27 checks passed
@pentschev pentschev deleted the skip-dgx-tcp-test-ucx-1.16 branch November 7, 2024 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change python python code needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants