Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalize GHA selectors for pure Python testing #1318

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

jakirkham
Copy link
Member

To eliminate hard-coding, generalize the GHA workflow logic to select one build for testing. This should simplify future Dask-CUDA updates.

xref: rapidsai/build-planning#25

To eliminate hard-coding, generalize the GHA workflow logic to select
one build for testing. This should simplify future Dask-CUDA updates.
@jakirkham jakirkham requested a review from a team as a code owner February 29, 2024 01:31
@jakirkham jakirkham added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Feb 29, 2024
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Seeing CI failures due to unrelated dask.dataframe deprecation warning/error ( #1319 )

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 6be9df9 into rapidsai:branch-24.04 Feb 29, 2024
29 checks passed
@jakirkham jakirkham deleted the drop_gha_hardcoding branch March 1, 2024 02:17
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks all! 🙏

younseojava pushed a commit to ROCm/dask-cuda-rocm that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
To eliminate hard-coding, generalize the GHA workflow logic to select one build for testing. This should simplify future Dask-CUDA updates.

xref: rapidsai/build-planning#25

Authors:
  - https://github.com/jakirkham

Approvers:
  - AJ Schmidt (https://github.com/ajschmidt8)
  - Ray Douglass (https://github.com/raydouglass)

URL: rapidsai#1318
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants