Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update setulb call from Scipy for updated signature of 1.15 #6207

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

dantegd
Copy link
Member

@dantegd dantegd commented Jan 5, 2025

Resolves the immediate update identified in #6206, we still should update things to not use internals of Scipy.

Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Jan 5, 2025

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Cython / Python Cython or Python issue label Jan 5, 2025
@dantegd dantegd added bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jan 5, 2025
@@ -175,12 +175,11 @@ def fprime_f(x):
wa[ib],
iwa[ib],
task[ib],
iprint,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we also remove this from the functions' signature if it has no more effect?

@betatim
Copy link
Member

betatim commented Jan 6, 2025

Looks reasonable. One thought I had: can we make it so that cuml works with both scipy < 1.15 and scipy >= 1.15? That would mean having some shim/compatibility built in at the point where we make use of the internal function.

If we don't make it work with multiple versions, then we should bump the minimum version required in the dependencies.

I have a slight preference for supporting several scipy versions instead of increasing the minimum version to 1.15 which is brand new.

@jameslamb
Copy link
Member

/ok to test

@dantegd dantegd marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 02:39
@dantegd dantegd requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 02:39
@dantegd dantegd requested review from cjnolet and bdice January 7, 2025 02:39
@vyasr
Copy link
Contributor

vyasr commented Jan 8, 2025

This PR is blocking a handful of things now. It looks like the last CI run only failed due to intermittent failures, so I triggered a rerun to hopeful get us to passing.

@vyasr vyasr requested a review from betatim January 8, 2025 16:21
@dantegd
Copy link
Member Author

dantegd commented Jan 8, 2025

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 4375738 into rapidsai:branch-25.02 Jan 8, 2025
59 of 62 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working Cython / Python Cython or Python issue non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants