-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 552
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix set_params for linear models #4096
Fix set_params for linear models #4096
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are another couple of algorithms that also have solvers that need to be tackled similarly:
- logistic regression
- ridge
Fix looks good, @lowener the only thing missing would be some form of testing, do you think it'd be feasible to add it to this PR or would it be better as a follow up? If a follow up, then can you create an issue and then I can go ahead and merge, thanks! |
@dantegd I added a test for every model impacted. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## branch-21.08 #4096 +/- ##
===============================================
Coverage ? 85.86%
===============================================
Files ? 231
Lines ? 18317
Branches ? 0
===============================================
Hits ? 15728
Misses ? 2589
Partials ? 0
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@gpucibot merge |
Closes rapidsai#4089 Authors: - Micka (https://github.com/lowener) Approvers: - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd) URL: rapidsai#4096
Closes #4089