Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW] Fixes issues with benchmark codes due to improper initialization #3039

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 23, 2020

Conversation

vinaydes
Copy link
Contributor

With new bckend couple of new parameters got introduced to decision tree parameter structure. Initializing those new parameters with this PR. Also instead of initialization by assignment, I have used the APIs for RF and decision tree parameters. This way, we would not miss changing the benchmark codes when RF or decision tree parameters are changed.

@vinaydes vinaydes requested a review from a team as a code owner October 22, 2020 09:31
@GPUtester
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

1 similar comment
@GPUtester
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@GPUtester
Copy link
Contributor

Please update the changelog in order to start CI tests.

View the gpuCI docs here.

@vinaydes vinaydes changed the title [WIP] Fixes issues with benchmark codes due to improper initialization [REVIEW] Fixes issues with benchmark codes due to improper initialization Oct 22, 2020
Copy link
Member

@teju85 teju85 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes LGTM.

@vinaydes
Copy link
Contributor Author

The build failures are related to my changes. I'll work on fixing them.

@vinaydes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Build errors fixed now, ready to merge.

@teju85 teju85 merged commit 4151520 into rapidsai:branch-0.17 Oct 23, 2020
@vinaydes vinaydes deleted the fix-rf-sg-benchmarks branch April 15, 2021 08:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants