-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 540
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] MNMG nightly tests remaining sporadic RF tests failures #3820
Comments
@viclafargue I filed #3830 to fix |
I was able to reproduce the error of |
Thanks guys! On my side, I could discover the reason behind the |
Answers #3820. This PR fixes the broadcast feature of the Random Forest estimator. The weights used by the reduction step were generated incorrectly. Indeed, the right values are to be deducted, for each chunk to be predicted, by the number estimators trained by the specific worker holding that chunk. The values wrongly used previously were the number of estimators held by each worker in the order of their construction. Authors: - Victor Lafargue (https://github.com/viclafargue) Approvers: - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd) URL: #3833
See #3820 Authors: - Micka (https://github.com/lowener) Approvers: - Victor Lafargue (https://github.com/viclafargue) - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd) URL: #3831
See #3820 Authors: - Philip Hyunsu Cho (https://github.com/hcho3) Approvers: - Victor Lafargue (https://github.com/viclafargue) - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd) URL: #3830
Answers rapidsai#3820. This PR fixes the broadcast feature of the Random Forest estimator. The weights used by the reduction step were generated incorrectly. Indeed, the right values are to be deducted, for each chunk to be predicted, by the number estimators trained by the specific worker holding that chunk. The values wrongly used previously were the number of estimators held by each worker in the order of their construction. Authors: - Victor Lafargue (https://github.com/viclafargue) Approvers: - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd) URL: rapidsai#3833
…3831) See rapidsai#3820 Authors: - Micka (https://github.com/lowener) Approvers: - Victor Lafargue (https://github.com/viclafargue) - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd) URL: rapidsai#3831
See rapidsai#3820 Authors: - Philip Hyunsu Cho (https://github.com/hcho3) Approvers: - Victor Lafargue (https://github.com/viclafargue) - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd) URL: rapidsai#3830
MNMG nightly tests only has a few remaining test failures. Fixing these would make it possible to have a perfect MNMG testing for the first time!
@hcho3 can you help on this? On my side, I'll investigate the
test_rf_broadcast
test and look for any regression related to CuPy update in it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: