Some legacy BFS cleanup #2347
Merged
Some legacy BFS cleanup #2347
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ere missed by an earlier PR
ChuckHastings
added
3 - Ready for Review
improvement
|
rerun tests |
seunghwak
approved these changes
Jun 21, 2022
|
@gpucibot merge |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Legacy BFS is still used by Betweenness Centrality. However, it's no longer called from python.
Remove the
call_bfsfunctions from cython.cu, and remove a few legacy SSSP files that were missed by an earlier PR.Also removed
call_hits, which is not currently used either.