Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define the uniform neighbor sampling C API #2112

Conversation

ChuckHastings
Copy link
Collaborator

@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings commented Mar 11, 2022

Define the uniform neighborhood sampling C API. The implementation will be done in a separate PR. An outline of what the implementation will resemble is provided (but ifdef'ed out).

@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings added this to the 22.04 milestone Mar 11, 2022
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings self-assigned this Mar 11, 2022
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings added feature request New feature or request 2 - In Progress non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Mar 11, 2022
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2022 18:41
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings requested review from a team as code owners March 16, 2022 18:41
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-22.04@08ab284). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 735674d differs from pull request most recent head ee3b4a3. Consider uploading reports for the commit ee3b4a3 to get more accurate results

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-22.04    #2112   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   73.99%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      157           
  Lines                   ?    10496           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?     7767           
  Misses                  ?     2729           
  Partials                ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 08ab284...ee3b4a3. Read the comment docs.

::cugraph_type_erased_device_array_view_t const* start,
::cugraph_type_erased_device_array_view_t const* start_label,
::cugraph_type_erased_host_array_view_t const* fan_out,
bool without_replacement)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The C++ API defines the semantic of this flag as with_replacement (which defaults to true). I know this code is ifdef-out for now, but it's meant to be brought back, as far as I understand.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. I defined this based on the old definition in the C++ API. Fixed in latest push.

const cugraph_type_erased_device_array_view_t* start,
const cugraph_type_erased_device_array_view_t* start_label,
const cugraph_type_erased_host_array_view_t* fan_out,
bool_t without_replacement,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No do_expensive_check here (at least as a placeholder even if we're not checking anything at this moment)?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added in latest push.

@ChuckHastings
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rerun tests

@BradReesWork
Copy link
Member

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit a024581 into rapidsai:branch-22.04 Mar 21, 2022
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings deleted the fea_add_neighborhood_sampling_to_capi branch March 31, 2022 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants