-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 917
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move libcudacxx to use rapids_cpm
and use newer versions
#9539
Move libcudacxx to use rapids_cpm
and use newer versions
#9539
Conversation
fd104f6
to
03ccc33
Compare
rapids_cpm
and use newer versions
f927c61
to
3088f44
Compare
rerun tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes all look good to me. My only question is, do we need to be doing anything about the libcudacxx libraries as well anywhere? The logic that I see is almost exclusively related to including the headers for compilation, is rapids_cpm_libcudacxx
handling making the libraries available for linking?
|
rerun tests |
1 similar comment
rerun tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All looks fine to me. Thanks @robertmaynard!
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## branch-21.12 #9539 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 10.79% 10.66% -0.13%
================================================
Files 116 117 +1
Lines 18869 19730 +861
================================================
+ Hits 2036 2104 +68
- Misses 16833 17626 +793
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
rerun tests |
3d97d9a
to
c8095ad
Compare
@jbrennan333 Could you take a look at this from the java side of things. I think it is fine, but I just don't have much experience with the compression libraries |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 the nvcomp-related changes look good to me.
rerun tests |
rerun tests |
@gpucibot merge |
Updates cudf to use the newest versions of nvbench and libcudacxx to allow compilation with both CUDA 11.4 and 11.5.