-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW] Dataframe.sort_index
optimizations
#9238
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 14 commits into
rapidsai:branch-21.10
from
galipremsagar:dataframe_sort_index_optimizations
Sep 16, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2a1b83b
optimize DataFrame.sort_index
galipremsagar 8e74cd0
fix sort_index
galipremsagar 0eb3302
doc
galipremsagar 509dd6c
add tests
galipremsagar 36fe12e
add Series.sort_index tests
galipremsagar 9c5dc43
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/branch-21.10' into dataframe_s…
galipremsagar dc85959
update api
galipremsagar 2042aa9
Merge branch 'branch-21.10' into dataframe_sort_index_optimizations
galipremsagar b878e6b
Update python/cudf/cudf/core/frame.py
galipremsagar ffa07ea
Update python/cudf/cudf/core/frame.py
galipremsagar e0e375f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/branch-21.10' into dataframe_s…
galipremsagar 68f1e97
Update python/cudf/cudf/core/frame.py
galipremsagar 13e3e14
Merge branch 'dataframe_sort_index_optimizations' of https://github.c…
galipremsagar 2c8110b
style
galipremsagar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just wondering,
is_monotonic_*
is available for both Index and MultiIndex. Maybe this optimization can be applied regardless of object type?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We would have to adhere to extracting level, which will be a
DataFrame
and again round-trip that back toMultiIndex
object to do anis_monotonic_*
check which seems to be inefficient and memory consuming.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also out of the context of this PR.. I can see the reason why we need to convert the index into a dataframe is because it's depending on
argsort
andtake
. Hopefully we can sink them intoFrame
so that there's no such need to convert to dataframes.The difficulty of sinking
argsort
is that I believeSeries
depends on a single column sort whileDataFrame
depends on a multi column sort.