Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix memory read/write error in concatenate_lists_ignore_null #8978

Merged

Conversation

davidwendt
Copy link
Contributor

@davidwendt davidwendt commented Aug 5, 2021

Reference #8883

Running cuda-memcheck on LISTS_TEST found a read error in the cudf::lists::detail::concatenate_lists_ignore_null() utility. This function is using thrust::transform to build the output offsets values and executes from 0 to num_rows+1. The device lambda included logic to update a temporary uint8 vector with validity value (0 or 1) for each row. Unfortunately, this required reading offset values at idx and idx+1 which would fail when idx==num_rows since idx+1 would be out-of-bounds for the input offsets in this case. Also, the validities[idx] statement would fail on write since idx==num_rows is past the end of this vector as well. Finally, the temporary validities vector was passed to cudf::detail::valid_if utility to turn it into a bitmask.

Since 2 kernels are used to create the output lists column, the temporary validities vector is not required since the valid_if utility can take a device predicate to build the bitmask instead. The code logic for determine validity was therefore moved from the transform call to the valid_if predicate instead. This keeps the same number of kernels without the need for the temporary buffer and fixes the out-of-bounds memory access.

@davidwendt davidwendt added bug Something isn't working 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team libcudf Affects libcudf (C++/CUDA) code. non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Aug 5, 2021
@davidwendt davidwendt self-assigned this Aug 5, 2021
@davidwendt davidwendt requested a review from a team as a code owner August 5, 2021 19:08
@davidwendt davidwendt requested review from harrism and devavret August 5, 2021 19:08
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 6, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.10@db63f61). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 2180e2c differs from pull request most recent head 6f7fed3. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6f7fed3 to get more accurate results
Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.10    #8978   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   10.58%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      116           
  Lines                   ?    18652           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?     1974           
  Misses                  ?    16678           
  Partials                ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update db63f61...6f7fed3. Read the comment docs.

@harrism
Copy link
Member

harrism commented Aug 11, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 2aaa57f into rapidsai:branch-21.10 Aug 11, 2021
@davidwendt davidwendt deleted the bug-memcheck-concat-list-elems branch August 11, 2021 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team bug Something isn't working libcudf Affects libcudf (C++/CUDA) code. non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants