Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW] ORC writer: fix incorrect ByteRLE encoding of literal_run=128 #3267

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 1, 2019

Conversation

OlivierNV
Copy link
Contributor

Literal runs of exactly 128 were encoded as a zero byte instead of 0x80.

@OlivierNV OlivierNV added 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team cuIO cuIO issue labels Oct 31, 2019
@OlivierNV OlivierNV self-assigned this Oct 31, 2019
@OlivierNV OlivierNV changed the title [WIP] ORC writer: fix incorrect ByteRLE encoding of literal_run=128 [REVIEW] ORC writer: fix incorrect ByteRLE encoding of literal_run=128 Oct 31, 2019
@OlivierNV OlivierNV marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2019 21:26
@OlivierNV OlivierNV requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2019 21:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3267 into branch-0.11 will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           branch-0.11    #3267   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        87.13%   87.13%           
============================================
  Files               49       49           
  Lines             9269     9269           
============================================
  Hits              8077     8077           
  Misses            1192     1192

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9cce809...7b76c74. Read the comment docs.

@OlivierNV OlivierNV merged commit 5a1b86d into rapidsai:branch-0.11 Nov 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team cuIO cuIO issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants