Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Partially reject dynamic groupby #16720

Conversation

wence-
Copy link
Contributor

@wence- wence- commented Sep 2, 2024

Description

We are not yet exposing the actual information that the groupby is dynamic, but this catches a bunch of cases.

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

We are not yet exposing the actual information that the groupby is
dynamic, but this catches a bunch of cases.
@wence- wence- added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Sep 2, 2024
@wence- wence- requested a review from a team as a code owner September 2, 2024 16:54
@wence- wence- requested review from mroeschke and charlesbluca and removed request for a team September 2, 2024 16:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added Python Affects Python cuDF API. cudf.polars Issues specific to cudf.polars labels Sep 2, 2024
@vyasr
Copy link
Contributor

vyasr commented Sep 3, 2024

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit b550645 into rapidsai:feature/cudf-polars Sep 3, 2024
80 of 81 checks passed
@wence- wence- deleted the wence/fea/polars-no-groupby-dynamic branch September 3, 2024 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cudf.polars Issues specific to cudf.polars improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change Python Affects Python cuDF API.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants