Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce version file so we can conditionally handle things in tests #16280

Merged

Conversation

wence-
Copy link
Contributor

@wence- wence- commented Jul 15, 2024

Description

We decided we would attempt to support a range of versions back to 1.0. We'll test with oldest and newest versions we support. To facilitate, introduce some versioning constants.

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

@wence- wence- requested a review from a team as a code owner July 15, 2024 15:17
@github-actions github-actions bot added Python Affects Python cuDF API. cudf.polars Issues specific to cudf.polars labels Jul 15, 2024
@wence- wence- added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jul 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@lithomas1 lithomas1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@wence-
Copy link
Contributor Author

wence- commented Jul 16, 2024

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit a6de6cc into rapidsai:branch-24.08 Jul 16, 2024
91 checks passed
@wence- wence- deleted the wence/fea/polars-versioning branch July 16, 2024 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cudf.polars Issues specific to cudf.polars improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change Python Affects Python cuDF API.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants