-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Parallelize gpuInitStringDescriptors
for fixed length byte array data
#16109
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 12 commits into
rapidsai:branch-24.08
from
mhaseeb123:paralllel-init-str-descriptors
Jul 9, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f34b5e9
parallelize gpuInitStringDescriptors for FLBA data
mhaseeb123 7cc5cf8
Merge branch 'rapidsai:branch-24.08' into paralllel-init-str-descriptors
mhaseeb123 b8a1ae3
minor improvements
mhaseeb123 0024713
Merge branch 'branch-24.08' into paralllel-init-str-descriptors
mhaseeb123 65e74c1
Add const where possible
mhaseeb123 423985a
remove temp variable `len` and directly assign to `str_len`
mhaseeb123 d4ee15f
Simplify `dict_idx` and `k` computation.
mhaseeb123 c674b4a
Apply suggestions from code review
mhaseeb123 d207dc5
Rename tile32 to tile_warp
mhaseeb123 64f36ba
Rename tile32 to tile_warp
mhaseeb123 4d20aeb
Pass cg via const reference instead of value
mhaseeb123 fb1ac34
Merge branch 'branch-24.08' into paralllel-init-str-descriptors
mhaseeb123 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would be nice to use
tile32
here since we already have it, but I'm not convinced it can be done in a simple way.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, you are right that we could replace this
t < 32
withtile_warp.meta_group_rank() == 0
and it should be good but the logic at L289 is messier to replace since it may betile_warp.meta_group_rank() == 0 or 1
depending onout_threads0 == 32 or 64
so I left this as is for simplicity.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could/should probably port the whole logic to
thread_group
s and avoid the magic 32 multiples. I'd expect that it would not be more complex than the current logic.Not something for this PR.