Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project automation update: skip if not in project #16035

Merged

Conversation

jarmak-nv
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR adds another condition to when we should run the automation work. PRs aren't always in the cuDF Python project so when this is the case we should skip the job rather than attempting to run it and have it throw an error.

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

@jarmak-nv jarmak-nv requested a review from a team as a code owner June 14, 2024 16:19
@jarmak-nv jarmak-nv requested a review from jameslamb June 14, 2024 16:19
@jarmak-nv jarmak-nv added non-breaking Non-breaking change improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function labels Jun 14, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jameslamb jameslamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewing because I was randomly chosen via CODEOWNERS.

This implementation looks fine to me based on the code I see at https://github.com/rapidsai/shared-workflows/blob/5fd16903025d905373bca6976b08f4db315e7c80/.github/workflows/project-get-item-id.yaml#L44.

But I don't know the context for this work so don't take my approval as an endorsement of skipping issues that are not in some project.

@vyasr
Copy link
Contributor

vyasr commented Jun 14, 2024

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 9dc5e8c into rapidsai:branch-24.08 Jun 14, 2024
75 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants