Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Enable more ignored pandas unit tests for cudf.pandas #15535

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 16, 2024
Merged

Enable more ignored pandas unit tests for cudf.pandas #15535

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

mroeschke
Copy link
Contributor

Description

If these test actually crash pytest workers, will add to TEST_THAT_CRASH_PYTEST_WORKERS

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

@mroeschke mroeschke added pandas improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Apr 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Python Affects Python cuDF API. label Apr 15, 2024
@mroeschke mroeschke marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2024 20:12
@mroeschke mroeschke requested a review from a team as a code owner April 16, 2024 20:12
@galipremsagar
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit b378b13 into rapidsai:branch-24.06 Apr 16, 2024
70 checks passed
@mroeschke mroeschke deleted the pandas/tests/maybe_crash branch April 16, 2024 22:10
@vyasr vyasr removed the pandas label May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@galipremsagar galipremsagar galipremsagar approved these changes

@vyasr vyasr vyasr approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change Python Affects Python cuDF API.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@mroeschke @galipremsagar @vyasr