-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Apply the cuFile error work around to data_sink as well #15335
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 7 commits into
rapidsai:branch-24.06
from
vuule:bug-cuda-ctx-always-global-init
Apr 1, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0763508
move ctx init to a global to cover all cases
vuule 098e3be
Merge branch 'branch-24.04' of https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf into …
vuule 69f3af7
too early; go back to in line calls
vuule 773a7b1
Merge branch 'branch-24.06' into bug-cuda-ctx-always-global-init
vuule 3ef4d32
periods.
vuule bcc53b1
Merge branch 'branch-24.06' into bug-cuda-ctx-always-global-init
vuule 34c8b26
Merge branch 'branch-24.06' into bug-cuda-ctx-always-global-init
vuule File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we hard code
0
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This initializes the context without actually doing anything.
https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-runtime-api/group__CUDART__MEMORY.html#group__CUDART__MEMORY_1ga042655cbbf3408f01061652a075e094
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is confusing. Maybe the CUDA doc is not accurate? If the input parameter is a pointer, we should pass in
nullptr
instead of0
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I can tell,
cudaFree(0)
is the idiomatic way to do this. nullptr would be a better option in general, but it looks likecudaFree(0)
is recognized as the idiom. I haven't seen a single reference wherecudaFree(nullptr)
is used.Edit: google search for "cudaFree(nullptr)": 121 hits vs cudaFree(0) 1220 hits 🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the idiom that I am familiar with as well.