Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW] Add notes to performance comparisons notebook #13044

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 31, 2023

Conversation

galipremsagar
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR adds a note section to the performance comparisons notebook to give users a disclaimer on what they need to do to run this notebook on lower-end hardware.

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

@galipremsagar galipremsagar added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Mar 30, 2023
@galipremsagar galipremsagar self-assigned this Mar 30, 2023
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@galipremsagar galipremsagar changed the title [REVIEW] Add notes to performance notebook [REVIEW] Add notes to performance comparisons notebook Mar 30, 2023
@galipremsagar galipremsagar requested review from vyasr and bdice March 30, 2023 22:41
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"This notebook compares the performance of `cuDF` and `pandas`. The comparisons performed are on identical data sizes. This notebook primarily showcases the factor\n",
"of speedups users can have when the similar `pandas` APIs are run on GPUs using `cudf`.\n",
"\n",
"The hardware details used to run these performance comparisons are at the end of this page."
"The hardware details used to run these performance comparisons are at the end of this page.\n",
Copy link
Contributor Author

@galipremsagar galipremsagar Mar 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've verified this claim holds true on a T4 by running the entire notebook after slashing the data-sizes in half.

@galipremsagar galipremsagar requested review from a team as code owners March 31, 2023 18:11
@github-actions github-actions bot added ci Python Affects Python cuDF API. labels Mar 31, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@bdice bdice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, with one minor question on file naming.

Copy link
Contributor

@vyasr vyasr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for the update

@galipremsagar galipremsagar added the 5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge label Mar 31, 2023
@galipremsagar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit f3f84f2 into rapidsai:branch-23.06 Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change Python Affects Python cuDF API.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants