Replace column/table test utilities with macros

[PointKernel]

w.r.t. #11007

This PR moves cudf::test::expect_column/table* utilities to the detail namespace and replace their use cases with corresponding macros when possible.

Description

Checklist

• I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
• New or existing tests cover these changes.
• The documentation is up to date with these changes.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-23.02@3bf6d1d). Click here to learn what that means.
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-23.02   #12242   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   88.20%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      137           
  Lines                   ?    22660           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    19988           
  Misses                  ?     2672           
  Partials                ?        0           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[davidwendt]

LGTM

[PointKernel]

@gpucibot merge

[karthikeyann]

@PointKernel Thank you for the cleanup. This cpp API usage still happens.
is there a way we can avoid using the cpp API directly instead of macro?
One idea is to leave a not in the API's documentation.

[PointKernel]

Is there a way we can avoid using the cpp API directly instead of macro?

I moved those utilities to detail namespace mainly for this reason.

One idea is to leave a not in the API's documentation.

Good point. I will put up a PR updating docs and comments for this.