Fix conditional_full_join benchmark

[GregoryKimball]

Description

The CONDITIONAL_FULL_JOIN_BENCHMARK_DEFINE benchmark category was mapping to cudf::conditional_inner_join instead of cudf::conditional_full_join

Checklist

• I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
• New or existing tests cover these changes.
• The documentation is up to date with these changes.

[robertmaynard]

LGTM after style issues are fixed

[divyegala]

Out of curiosity, why is everything macros?

[davidwendt]

Out of curiosity, why is everything macros?

We are using google-benchmark and that is how you use it: https://github.com/google/benchmark/blob/main/docs/user_guide.md

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 87.47% // Head: 88.11% // Increases project coverage by +0.63% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (b38bc6c) compared to base (f817d96).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           branch-22.12   #12121      +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage         87.47%   88.11%   +0.63%     
================================================
  Files               133      135       +2     
  Lines             21826    22100     +274     
================================================
+ Hits              19093    19473     +380     
+ Misses             2733     2627     -106     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/interval.py	85.45% <0.00%> (-9.10%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/io/text.py	91.66% <0.00%> (-8.34%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/_base_index.py	81.28% <0.00%> (-4.27%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/io/json.py	92.06% <0.00%> (-2.68%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/utils/utils.py	89.91% <0.00%> (-0.69%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/timedelta.py	90.17% <0.00%> (-0.58%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/datetime.py	89.21% <0.00%> (-0.51%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/column.py	87.96% <0.00%> (-0.46%)	⬇️
python/dask_cudf/dask_cudf/core.py	73.72% <0.00%> (-0.41%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/io/parquet.py	90.45% <0.00%> (-0.39%)	⬇️
... and 43 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[GregoryKimball]

@gpucibot merge