-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add row hasher with nested column support #10641
Conversation
Many iterations already happened. I just realized late that I should commit
sliced no longer works
New verticalization code that includes list all the way up, skipping structs that were included
@bdice @jrhemstad I've addressed the remaining comments that I either viewed as blockers or as simple enough to be easily fixed without expanding this PR's scope. I opened two issue for follow-ups regarding 1) improved testing and 2) further performance profiling, both of which I think can be done after this PR is merged. I have held off approving myself so that this PR is not accidentally merged before reviewers are happy, but I think this should be good to go once you two are happy. I'm happy to address future change requests on this PR while Devavret is out. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Feedback attached. I'll discuss with @vyasr and one of us will resolve these comments.
…ination operator is not commutative nor associative.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy with this PR. I have two very small comments/questions but we should move forward and get this merged to unblock other work.
I've got one question but I think we can merge and then discuss it. This looks ready to go to me! |
@gpucibot merge |
Ask away! |
Contributes to #10186